<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Rants on The Truth Imperative</title><link>https://truthimperative.axley.net/tags/rants/</link><description>Recent content in Rants on The Truth Imperative</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2026 09:52:19 -0800</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://truthimperative.axley.net/tags/rants/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Artificial definitions</title><link>https://truthimperative.axley.net/posts/2026/artificial-definitions/</link><pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2026 09:52:19 -0800</pubDate><guid>https://truthimperative.axley.net/posts/2026/artificial-definitions/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Just saw a post talking about someone predicting when we&amp;rsquo;ll see &amp;ldquo;ASI&amp;rdquo; (artificial superintelligence). The grifters haven&amp;rsquo;t even managed a decent definition of &amp;ldquo;AGI&amp;rdquo;, let alone, &amp;ldquo;AI&amp;rdquo;. What is &amp;ldquo;ASI&amp;rdquo;? We&amp;rsquo;re told it&amp;rsquo;s &amp;ldquo;defined&amp;rdquo; by Nick Bostrom. I went to find that definition because the way it was paraphrased didn&amp;rsquo;t &amp;ldquo;define&amp;rdquo; anything in a meaningful way – certainly not in any measurable way.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Nick&amp;rsquo;s definition of Superintelligence (not Artificial superintelligence, BTW):&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Dangerous Plastic Packaging</title><link>https://truthimperative.axley.net/2006/12/dangerous-plastic-packaging.html</link><pubDate>Sat, 02 Dec 2006 15:54:00 -0800</pubDate><guid>https://truthimperative.axley.net/2006/12/dangerous-plastic-packaging.html</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I&amp;rsquo;ve been wondering this and noting that more and more products are coming wrapped in this stuff.  I use a tchochke that I got from Tripwire that has a tiny corner of a razor blade on it to open these packages, but even then, the cut plastic package is sharper than the razor.  I&amp;rsquo;ve cut myself on several occasions.  The unusual shapes of the packages doesn&amp;rsquo;t make it very easy to cleanly open either.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Apostrophe Abuse Is Cruel</title><link>https://truthimperative.axley.net/2006/11/apostrophe-abuse-is-cruel.html</link><pubDate>Wed, 22 Nov 2006 15:48:00 -0800</pubDate><guid>https://truthimperative.axley.net/2006/11/apostrophe-abuse-is-cruel.html</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://www.boingboing.net/2006/11/21/atrocious_apostrophe.html" title="Boing Boing: Atrocious apostrophe's and "&gt;Boing Boing: Atrocious apostrophe&amp;rsquo;s and &amp;ldquo;quotation&amp;rdquo; &amp;ldquo;mark&amp;rdquo; &amp;ldquo;abuse&amp;rdquo; photo galleries&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Two Flikr galleries dedicated to photo&amp;rsquo;s of apostrophe and quotation mark abuse. I can&amp;rsquo;t believe my previous post on &lt;a href="https://truthimperative.axley.net/archives/2005/11/common_writing.html"&gt;Common writing mistakes&lt;/a&gt; didn&amp;rsquo;t touch on this pet peeve of mine.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Data Shows Overuse Of The Word 'Pandemic' Becoming 'Global Pandemic'</title><link>https://truthimperative.axley.net/2005/12/data-shows-overuse-of-word-becoming.html</link><pubDate>Wed, 07 Dec 2005 06:33:00 -0800</pubDate><guid>https://truthimperative.axley.net/2005/12/data-shows-overuse-of-word-becoming.html</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;One example: &lt;a href="https://bankinfosecurity.com/node/2696"&gt;https://bankinfosecurity.com/node/2696&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Isn&amp;rsquo;t &amp;ldquo;Global pandemic&amp;rdquo; a bit redundant? Also, is the term &amp;ldquo;pandemic&amp;rdquo; even appropriate, or the most appropriate, to describe an Internet-based malady? Pandemic implies distribution over a large &lt;em&gt;geographic&lt;/em&gt; area.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Plenty more &lt;a href="https://news.google.com/news?q=pandemic&amp;amp;hl=en&amp;amp;lr=&amp;amp;sa=N&amp;amp;tab=nn&amp;amp;oi=newsr"&gt;https://news.google.com/news?q=pandemic&amp;amp;hl=en&amp;amp;lr=&amp;amp;sa=N&amp;amp;tab=nn&amp;amp;oi=newsr&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;And thankfully I found this article criticizing this trend: &lt;a href="https://blogs.chicagotribune.com/news_columnists_ezorn/2005/11/the_pandemic_ep.html"&gt;The &amp;lsquo;Pandemic&amp;rsquo; Epidemic&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>The complete toll of the Iraq War</title><link>https://truthimperative.axley.net/2005/11/the-complete-toll-of-iraq-war.html</link><pubDate>Wed, 09 Nov 2005 14:11:00 -0800</pubDate><guid>https://truthimperative.axley.net/2005/11/the-complete-toll-of-iraq-war.html</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;It really miffs me to hear media focus entirely on the number of death-specific casualties of the Iraq war but completely ignore the other horrible casualties. From the McLaughlin Group, 11/4/05:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;MR. MCLAUGHLIN: Okay, the human toll: The U.S. military dead in Iraq, including suicides, 2,035; U.S. military amputeed, wounded, injured, mentally ill, 48,100; Iraqi civilians dead, 117,700.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Note to the media: Why don&amp;rsquo;t you ask yourselves why it is only the number of _dead_ servicemen who you choose to highlight? Isn&amp;rsquo;t &lt;strong&gt;48,100 WOUNDED US CITIZENS&lt;/strong&gt; an even more horrific number? Yes, 2035 dead US Citizens is tragic, but death is not the only tragic consequence for the soldiers.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>