<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Mobile on The Truth Imperative</title><link>https://truthimperative.axley.net/tags/mobile/</link><description>Recent content in Mobile on The Truth Imperative</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2014 15:05:00 -0700</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://truthimperative.axley.net/tags/mobile/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Ios Clients Not Vulnerable To Heartbleed What Does The Source Say</title><link>https://truthimperative.axley.net/2014/04/ios-clients-not-vulnerable-to.html</link><pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2014 15:05:00 -0700</pubDate><guid>https://truthimperative.axley.net/2014/04/ios-clients-not-vulnerable-to.html</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;img alt="" height="413" id="h-rh-i-0" src="https://truthimperative.axley.net/heartbleed.png" width="341"&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Apple&amp;rsquo;s language in their assertion that they are not vulnerable to heartbleed on iOS are troubling as they specifically say (via &lt;a href="https://recode.net/2014/04/10/apple-says-ios-osx-and-key-web-services-not-affected-by-heartbleed-security-flaw/"&gt;ReCode&lt;/a&gt;), &amp;ldquo;IOS and OS X never incorporated the vulnerable software&amp;hellip;&amp;rdquo;  However, not incorporating the vulnerable OpenSSL software is merely one way that their customers could have been made vulnerable.  What about the Apple SSL/TLS implementation?  Has anyone checked it?  Did they incorporate &lt;a href="https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6520"&gt;RFC 6520&lt;/a&gt; for heartbeat support?  I couldn&amp;rsquo;t find anything Google so figured I would share what I found.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>